{"id":2560,"date":"2026-04-20T16:25:55","date_gmt":"2026-04-20T14:25:55","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/clearorg.eu\/?p=2560"},"modified":"2026-04-20T16:25:55","modified_gmt":"2026-04-20T14:25:55","slug":"borderline-cosmetic-products-regulation-europe","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/clearorg.eu\/en\/borderline-cosmetic-products-regulation-europe\/","title":{"rendered":"Borderline Products: Key Considerations for Securing the Status of Your Cosmetics in Europe"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Placing a product on the European market primarily depends on its legal classification. This classification directly determines the regulatory framework that applies to it and carries significant implications, particularly regarding consumer safety.<\/p>\n<p>In cosmetics, this step can prove challenging when certain products fall at the boundary with other categories, such as medicinal products, biocides, medical devices, or even toys.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/eur-lex.europa.eu\/legal-content\/fr\/ALL\/?uri=CELEX%3A32009R1223\">Regulation (EC) No. 1223\/2009<\/a> defines a cosmetic product as:<br \/>\n<em>\u201cAny substance or mixture intended to be placed in contact with the external parts of the human body (epidermis, hair system, nails, lips and external genital organs) or with the teeth and the mucous membranes of the oral cavity, with a view exclusively or mainly to cleaning them, perfuming them, changing their appearance, protecting them, keeping them in good condition or correcting body odours.\u201d<\/em><\/p>\n<p>Therefore, the product\u2019s presentation, function, area of application, and claims may lead to a change in its regulatory status.<\/p>\n<p><strong>\u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n<h5>Examples of \u201cborderline\u201d products:<\/h5>\n<ul>\n<li>Skin patches<\/li>\n<li>Children\u2019s party make-up<\/li>\n<li>Breath-freshening sprays or chewing gums<\/li>\n<li>\u201cBumps and bruises\u201d balms<\/li>\n<li>Anti-lice shampoos<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><strong>\u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n<h5>How can you ensure compliance with cosmetic status?<\/h5>\n<p>The definition of a cosmetic product highlights three cumulative criteria used to verify its regulatory status:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>Product type: substance or mixture<\/li>\n<li>Area of application<\/li>\n<li>Function<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>To support manufacturers, the European Commission relies in particular on the \u201c<strong><a href=\"https:\/\/webgate.ec.europa.eu\/circabc-ewpp\/d\/d\/workspace\/SpacesStore\/95fd87e4-5ded-4921-958c-75ff482b3d4c\/download\">Manual of the Working Group on Cosmetic Products (Sub-Group on Borderline Products) on the Scope of Application of the Cosmetic Regulation (EC) No. 1223\/2009.<\/a>\u201d<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Updated in June 2025, this manual reiterates these three qualification criteria and provides numerous examples in a Q&amp;A format.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<h5>\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a01. Product type: substance or mixture<\/h5>\n<p><strong>Dental floss<\/strong> is an interesting example: it meets the criteria for area of application (teeth and oral mucosa) and function (cleaning\/protecting\/maintaining in good condition). However, it is not presented as a substance or mixture and therefore does not meet the definition of a cosmetic product.<\/p>\n<p>Similarly, <strong>skin patches<\/strong> are not considered cosmetic products as such due to their form. However, they generally contain a substance that may meet the \u201cproduct type\u201d criterion for cosmetics, provided the function is not physiological.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<h5>\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a02. Area of application: external parts of the human body<\/h5>\n<p>A product claiming a cosmetic function, such as a <strong>breath-freshening spray or chewing gum,<\/strong> is not considered a cosmetic because the released substance is intended to be ingested (oral route). It is not predominantly spat out like toothpaste, where ingestion is accidental. These products are generally considered foodstuffs under Regulation (EC) No. 178\/2002.<\/p>\n<p>Likewise, a <strong>product intended for cleansing the vagina<\/strong> does not meet the definition of a cosmetic product, as the site of application does not correspond to the <u>external<\/u> genital organs.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<h5>\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a03. Intended function<\/h5>\n<p><strong>Children\u2019s party make-up<\/strong>, due to its presentation, may fall within the scope of Directive 2009\/48\/EC on toy safety. Its function of applying make-up to the skin also brings it under cosmetic regulations, regardless of the user\u2019s age. The same applies to fun bath products intended for children, such as bath bombs.<\/p>\n<p>A product intended for application to the skin in cases of minor <strong>\u201cbumps and bruises\u201d<\/strong> will not be considered a cosmetic if it is intended to reduce bruising and swelling and is likely to exert a physiological effect. It may fall at the boundary with medicinal products or medical devices.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Anti-lice shampoos<\/strong> are not cosmetic products because their exclusive or primary function is not to clean, unlike conventional shampoos.<\/p>\n<p>Depending on their composition, mode of action, and claims, these products may fall under medicinal products, medical devices (with a physical mode of action), or biocides (repellent\/insecticidal).<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<h5>Be careful with claims<\/h5>\n<p>The claims attributed to your product may also change its status. Reference should be made to<a href=\"https:\/\/eur-lex.europa.eu\/legal-content\/FR\/TXT\/?uri=CELEX%3A32013R0655\"> Regulation (EU) No. 655\/2013<\/a>\u2014establishing common criteria\u2014as well as the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.arpp.org\/nous-consulter\/regles\/regles-de-deontologie\/recommandation-produits-cosmetiques-v8\/\">ARPP recommendation on cosmetic products<\/a>. Particular care should be taken not to assign therapeutic claims, implying action beyond the superficial layers of the human body, or claims that could create confusion with food products.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<h5>What about international status ?<\/h5>\n<p>In Europe, the classification of borderline products relies on a detailed, case-by-case analysis ensuring a high level of regulatory standards.<\/p>\n<p>Internationally, approaches differ, with categories such as <em>OTC<\/em> (Over-The-Counter drugs) in the United States (notably for sunscreens), <em>Natural Health Products<\/em> (NHP) in Canada, or <em>special cosmetics<\/em> in China. In this context, the same product may fall under different regulatory frameworks depending on the market, making classification a key strategic issue for global commercialization.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>CLEAR can support you in securing the classification of your cosmetic products in Europe and internationally, feel free to <a href=\"https:\/\/clearorg.eu\/en\/contact\/\">contact us<\/a>!<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><em><u>Sources<\/u> :<\/em><\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/single-market-economy.ec.europa.eu\/sectors\/cosmetics\/cosmetic-products-specific-topics\/borderline-products_en\">Borderline products &#8211; Internal Market, Industry, Entrepreneurship and SMEs<\/a><\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/webgate.ec.europa.eu\/circabc-ewpp\/d\/d\/workspace\/SpacesStore\/95fd87e4-5ded-4921-958c-75ff482b3d4c\/download\">MANUAL ON THE SCOPE OF APPLICATION OF THE COSMETICS DIRECTIVE 76\/768\/EEC (ART<\/a><\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/eur-lex.europa.eu\/eli\/reg\/2013\/655\/oj?eliuri=eli%3Areg%3A2013%3A655%3Aoj&amp;locale=fr\">R\u00e8glement &#8211; 655\/2013 &#8211; FR &#8211; EUR-Lex<\/a><\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.arpp.org\/nous-consulter\/regles\/regles-de-deontologie\/recommandation-produits-cosmetiques-v8\/\">Recommandation Produits cosm\u00e9tiques V8 &#8211; ARPP<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Placing a product on the European market primarily depends on its legal classification.<span class=\"excerpt-hellip\"> [\u2026]<\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":113,"featured_media":2563,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[256,253,204,252,99,254,255,101],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/clearorg.eu\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2560"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/clearorg.eu\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/clearorg.eu\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/clearorg.eu\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/113"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/clearorg.eu\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2560"}],"version-history":[{"count":5,"href":"https:\/\/clearorg.eu\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2560\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2576,"href":"https:\/\/clearorg.eu\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2560\/revisions\/2576"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/clearorg.eu\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/2563"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/clearorg.eu\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2560"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/clearorg.eu\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2560"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/clearorg.eu\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2560"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}