Beauty market: as fashion slows, luxury turns to fragrance and cosmetics

Nanomaterials in Cosmetics: Where Do We Stand?
19 October 2026
Black Friday beauté 2026 : trois flacons ambrés de soin posés sur du marbre blanc
Black Friday 2026 for beauty brands: preparing the holiday season as e-commerce accelerates
23 October 2026
Nanomaterials in Cosmetics: Where Do We Stand?
19 October 2026
Black Friday beauté 2026 : trois flacons ambrés de soin posés sur du marbre blanc
Black Friday 2026 for beauty brands: preparing the holiday season as e-commerce accelerates
23 October 2026

On 12 October 2026, LVMH published its third-quarter sales: the group posted 1% organic growth, but its Fashion & Leather Goods division fell 5%, partly because of weaker demand in China. In the same release, Perfumes & Cosmetics grew 1% over the quarter and Selective Retailing, which includes Sephora, gained 8%. For the head of a fashion, home decor or lifestyle brand, these figures raise a simple question: can the beauty market become a growth relay when the core business slows down?

What the 12 October 2026 LVMH figures really say

According to LVMH’s release of 12 October 2026, group revenue reached about €18.5 billion in the third quarter, with organic growth of 1%, against 3% in the previous quarter. Fashion & Leather Goods, the group’s largest division, fell 5% organically over the quarter and 2% over the first nine months. The group attributes this to a less supportive environment in China. This is a slowdown, not a collapse, but it is clear enough for management teams to look elsewhere.

On the beauty side, the picture is more nuanced than it appears. Again according to LVMH, the Perfumes & Cosmetics division generated about €2 billion in sales in the third quarter, up 1% organically after a 1% decline in the second quarter. Over nine months it is stable organically, at about €5.9 billion. The group points to Parfums Christian Dior launches, growth at Guerlain and makeup. Beauty therefore does not “save” the quarter: it holds up, which, in this context, is already an argument.

The most instructive figure may concern distribution. According to the same publication, Selective Retailing grew 8% in the third quarter and 6% over nine months, with Sephora continuing to gain market share. In other words, consumers keep buying beauty, and increasingly in multi-brand retailers. For a brand wishing to enter this market, the way in is not only creating a product: it is also gaining access to these shelves, which drive visibility.

These data come from a single group and do not sum up the sector. Another indicator points the same way: according to Circana, US prestige beauty sales rose 7% in the first half of 2026, to $17.1 billion, driven notably by fragrance. Caution is still needed: part of this increase comes from higher average prices, and volumes remain calmer. Beauty is holding up better than leather goods, but it is not immune to a more selective consumer.

Why beauty attracts brands when fashion slows

The first mechanism is the entry price. A fragrance, a lipstick or a skincare product lets a customer access a brand’s universe for a fraction of the price of a handbag. When purchasing power or confidence weakens, this entry point keeps selling, and it keeps the link with customers alive. For a fashion house, beauty is also a way to stay present in the daily life of customers who no longer buy clothes or accessories as often.

The second mechanism is repurchase frequency. A cosmetic product is consumed, and therefore bought again, whereas a luxury accessory is a rare purchase. This recurrence makes revenue more predictable and feeds a direct relationship with the brand, notably through online sales and social media. But there is a flip side: it requires a supply chain, inventory, customer service and distribution logistics very different from those of fashion, which many executives underestimate.

A brand licence agreement is the mechanism by which a brand owner authorises a specialist to design, manufacture and distribute products under its name, in return for royalties. It is the historical route for fashion-led beauty. It has its strengths (industrial expertise is entrusted to a partner) and its limits (control over the product and the timeline is shared). The events of 2026 show how strategic this trade-off remains, even for the largest houses.

Gucci, Versace: two ways into beauty, two timelines

The first public example is Gucci. On 7 July 2026, Kering and L’Oréal announced a 50-year exclusive worldwide licence for Gucci fragrances and beauty products, following the alliance concluded between the two groups on 19 October 2025. According to both groups’ releases, L’Oréal will take over the development, marketing and distribution of Gucci Beauty on 1 July 2027, subject to regulatory approvals. Beauty is treated here as a long-term asset entrusted to an industrial player, with a transition period of nearly a year.

The second example is of a different nature. On 21 September 2026, Donatella Versace and the US retailer Revolve announced, in a joint release, the launch of a new fashion and beauty business, separate from the Versace house. According to the announcement, beauty will launch first, with the brand name and first products still to be unveiled in the coming months. This set-up relies on a creative figure, a retailer with customer data and a step-by-step launch, a model very different from a licence granted to a large group.

These two cases cannot be transposed as they stand to a small fashion or home decor business, but they shed light on shared choices. Should manufacturing and distribution be delegated to a partner? Should a dedicated entity be created? Start with a single product, or a range? In every case, they teach one thing: beauty is not launched like a collection extension. It requires its own timeline, industrial partners and a long-term investment, which the 2026 announcements confirm, even among the biggest names.

Eyeing the beauty market? The questions to settle before the first bottle

At Clear, an EU / UK / US cosmetic regulatory compliance firm, we regularly meet executives who arrive with a polished brand universe, a name, an identity, sometimes an interested retailer, but with no answer to very concrete questions. Who manufactures? Under what conditions? Who is responsible for the product once it is on the market? Field experience shows that the strongest projects are those where these points are raised from the start, before visuals are created and before commercial agreements are signed, because they determine the real launch timeline.

Without going into regulatory detail, which is covered by other Clear content, one principle is worth remembering: within the European Union, a cosmetic product must have a designated Responsible Person and a PIF (Product Information File) kept available for the authorities. These elements cannot be settled in a few days, and they weigh on lead times. To gauge the scale of your project, the page on support for cosmetic industry players presents how Clear works.

Five points deserve a decision before committing:

  • the model (licence, manufacturing partnership, own brand) and the split of control;
  • the choice of manufacturer and its ability to work according to good manufacturing practice;
  • brand protection in cosmetic product classes, in each target market;
  • the targeted distribution channel: online, multi-brand retailer or own boutique;
  • a realistic timeline, from brief to first product on the shelf.

The question of the brand deserves particular attention. Your name is a valuable asset: before putting it on a bottle, check that it is available and protected for cosmetic products, which is not automatic for a brand registered only in fashion. That is the role of brand protection: securing the name before launch investments are made, rather than discovering a conflict once products have been manufactured.

Frequently asked questions

Can a fashion brand launch a cosmetics range without manufacturing it itself?

Yes, and it is the most common case. Manufacturing can be entrusted to a contract manufacturer, or the brand can grant a licence to a specialist. In both cases the brand remains exposed: it chooses the partner, approves the product and carries its image. It is therefore necessary to clarify by contract who takes on which responsibilities, and to check that the manufacturer works to recognised standards.

Is beauty really more resilient than fashion in 2026?

The figures published by LVMH on 12 October 2026 suggest beauty is more stable than fashion and leather goods, but they concern a single group, and the growth remains low. Circana’s data for the United States point the same way, while showing a more selective consumer. Beauty is a plausible relay, not a guarantee of growth.

How long does it take to launch a first cosmetic product?

There is no single duration: it depends on the type of product, the manufacturer, testing and the distribution channel. The 2026 announcements give an idea for large groups, with a transition of nearly a year for Gucci. For a small business, the safest approach is to start from the manufacturer’s timeline and to set the launch date only after each step has been validated.

In short: when fashion and leather goods slow down, as at LVMH in the third quarter of 2026 (−5%), beauty appears as a plausible relay, because it is more accessible and bought more often. But it requires a clear model (licence, partnership or own brand), a reliable manufacturer, a protected brand and its own timeline. The beauty market is prepared before it is entered.

Are you considering opening your brand to beauty or structuring an existing range? Let’s discuss your project: contact Clear to review the steps to plan before launch.